whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat the heeeeeeeeeeck…. is there even a point to painting that good?
Johan
There is NO WAY those are paintings!!..
BriannaNicole
My mind wass blown at first too, but they are! Oil on canvas!
Cutovoi
I´m done. Envy.
-TC-
http://milkieroad.wordpress.com Angele
I can’t… I don’t believe it.
Those must be very well photoshopped pictures.
BriannaNicole
They are real! Oil on canvas! Mind blowing :O
http://www.photoboothworks.com Jorrit
That first one is really good. The last one you see it a tiny bit
http://robincamille.com Robin in Paris
Modern day Norman Rockwell!
c_los
wtf wtf wtf wt fwt fwtfw
http://helkarava.com helkarava
nice waste of time.
M.R.
I definately tip my hat to this guy, forget HD tv….hes doin HD PAINTINGS
http://www.eggd.ca ezra
that doesn’t even make sense
http://flickr.com/photos/dutchct/ dutch
They kind of look like 3d renders.
Do you know anything about the process? Surely he must have a photo(s) to work from?
BriannaNicole
Yes, he uses high quality pictures to look at and I think projects them onto his canvas to trace, but he does do all the painting himself. Oil on canvas! It’s insane
so c.
WHAT?
SCRM
I think we all need to get together, find this man and beat him senseless.
http://flickr.com/photos/migs88 miguel santiago
hooooooooow?
jaca
he’s very patient I must admit, but i don’t like those painings – we have cameras to do photos. it’s completly soulless.
even if it’s really awesome, i agree with Jaca too.
student
maybe that’s his point. I dunno. Maybe that’s the reaction he wanted.
“Shit! those are paintings! No way??”
“What’s the point?”
“There is no soul. we can use cameras for that.”
Since most of the subjects are mundane objects that show how material our life is..
Maybe he was tryin to make a statement, IMO
http://www.flickr.com/estellef Estelle Flores
yeah, it’s really impressive… but I think I would like a lot more if it came with the concept, I mean, nobody does that kind of painting without a really strong concept, knowing that it will be judged as “complete waste of time” (I agree with that, at least, for now).
I admit that the concept is clear once you think about it, BUT, still, pop art did that a long time ago.
http://www.flickr.com/estellef Estelle Flores
Student, I do agree with you…. IT MUST have a concept, but, is it enough? Even if the artist is expecting this kind of reaction, WHO IN THE WORLD WOULD HAVE THAT KIND OF TROUBLE to make realistic paintings like that, just to receive a weak response? These paintings give you something to think about… but just for 5 minutes. Is the juice worth the squeeze?
http://www.jeffhamada.com/ jeffhamada
^ yea great points. i feel the same way when i see any photorealistic painting to be on honest, even when they are fantastic portraits of people and not these mundane everyday things – and especially when they are copied from an identical photograph.
i do find the magazine rack interesting and perhaps its the one that leads me to believe Bernardi is attempting to make a statement, similar to what Student mentioned. the craft here is incredible i wouldn’t hang them on my wall though.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dutchct/ dutch
Gotta give him credit, he’s probably the most controversial/talked about artist ever posted on booom?
You should post more stuff like this jeff. Make people think beyond “i like this” or “meh”
http://www.jeffhamada.com/ jeffhamada
the Valerie Hegarty post remains the most debated – 70 comments or something
1. draw a really small grid
2. take a photo
3. grid up several high quality printouts of that photo
4. start mixing the colours
5. commit suicide due to the inane pointlessness of life
6. make sure you have good quality sun lights
7. whoops
http://www.radwafouda.blogspot.com Radz
This is Caraaaazily purrrrrrrrrrrrfect, how os that a painting!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!8o
jammal
He does take the photograph and then transcribes it (perhaps from slide, perhaps using the grid system), but I think the point of it is to take the concept of actually freezing a moment in time that actually happened from the monopoly of photography and brings back some of the glory to oil paint.
Jason
First and last ones are photos. They are the photos he will use to paint from. I don’t know why he posts them as “work in progress”.
zanez
helkarava – good one.kinda agree, but if it’s your passion to get done shits we see us around in that HQ on paper.. with color ,than .. do it. and he does it in MAX HQ
still WTF !
coco
i’m sure we all wish we could do what this guy can do. agree?
http://pipimerah.com/ hai Pip
wow..THIS IS 4D
AIDA
wooooooooooooow
maryam
very gooooooooooooooood.
aida
hi
it s very good
x
http://MODHArts Maryana
No, this is not a photo, i saw 1st painting just last week at Bernaducci.Meisel Gallery, exactly the same as it is above. It is photorealism, due to the advantage of technology, some artists use photograph and projector on canvas and some artist use in addition an airbrush tool. Examples are Bernardo Torrens and Hubert de Lartigue.
I just discovered this guy. I looked through an entire album of his work thinking they were photographs, only to go back and see the album was titled “paintings”. I sat there with my mind blown for like 15 minutes! He is my ultimate role model, absolutely incredible!
Pingback: Hyper Realism in Art: These Are Not Photographs! | WebUrbanist
Pingback: Hyper Realism in Art: These Are Not Photographs! | BLOG